AMOD Methodology for the construction of a Training Curriculum
Seminar – Workshop led by Dr. Leonard Mertens
Buenos Aires, September 30, 1998
National Directorate of Employment and Training Policies
Ministry of Employment and Vocational Training
Introduction
This document provides an overview of the Seminar – Workshop led by Dr. Leonard Mertens, on “Analysis of Labor Skills and Curriculum Development”, held on September 30, 1998.
This activity is part of the actions that the Directorate of Technical Assistance for Employment and Job Training is conducting with the aim to identify and analyze different methodologies for the analysis of Labor Skills and Curriculum Development. It also fits in with the technical assistance activities that support the development of Pilot Project Work Skills Certification (Sub-Working Group 10 of MERCOSUR).
On this occasion, the expert presented and coordinated an exercise in applying the method AMOD (acronym in English of a model) for the construction of a curriculum based on Job Skills.
The event involved the active participation of specialists and technicians to the area of training, both from companies and training institutions such as the Public Sector, with whom he conducted an exercise of the method mentioned above.
This paper presents, first, some theoretical and methodological background of the AMOD method and scope. On the other hand, describes the steps required for implementation.
I. Theoretical and methodological background of AMOD.
Both the AMOD method as others (eg, the SCID, an acronym in English of Systematic Development of a Curriculum) are complementary methods of DACUM (an acronym in English of a Curriculum Development). The latter was created in Canada and developed in the United States at the University of Ohio in the late sixties, and part of the following events:
· Expert workers describe their job better than anyone else,
· To define a function, you must describe in detail the tasks that compose it,
· For the proper execution of tasks is necessary to understand the knowledge, skills, tools and attitudes that enable outstanding performance.
These assumptions are theoretically based on behavioral and functional perspectives. (1)
The DACUM is a participatory method that allows, essentially identifying the tasks and functions that a worker must be able to do to achieve a successful performance.
Among the strengths of the method, one can note the following:
· Generates interaction and synergy in the group,
· Third building group consensus,
· It allows the construction of a run or sequence of actions useful for the design of training,
• It is quick to apply and low cost
Promotes the participation and commitment of the actors (supervisor and employee).
In terms of its limitations, it may indicate that:
• Do not allow a relationship between behavioral and attitudinal aspects,
• Do not build performance criteria,
• Do not allow to develop training strategies and evaluation.
Given these limitations, using two complementary methods of the above-AMOD-SCID and for defining performance criteria and evidence in order to evaluate the person and guide the learning process.
The method promotes SCID-from the statements of DACUM-a detailed analysis of tasks.
The information surveyed allows you to set parameters under which the worker must show their performance: compliance with safety standards, attitudes and behaviors that lead to outstanding performance, possible errors, machines, tools and materials used.
Also, with this information are constructed tutorials in which the worker is supported to meet the performance standards expected.
The self-assessment is conducted through a questionnaire and assessment instructor / supervisor includes:
“A global assessment with a score of 1-4
“An evaluation of the critical points in the sequence of threads, using the yes / no.
It’s worth noting that the evaluation criteria in both methods differ: in the SCID describes the performance criteria based on measurable indicators, while in the AMOD reference is only subjective.
The AMOD method of the same principles of the DACUM, but differs from it because, like the SCID, “… seeks to establish a direct relationship between elements of the curriculum and the sequence of training and evaluation of the learning process … “and its main features, speed and ease of application.
Also, is characterized by putting emphasis on the relationship between self-evaluation of the instructor / supervisor.
II. Fitness AMOD method.
Establishment of the Panel (2)
Participating in the discussion board workers with proven experience and some of their supervisors. The experience is guided by a facilitator who is assisted by a colleague, who writes the particulars relating to the powers referred to by experts, preferably with another person who records the critical points that arise during the exercise.
In addition, others participate as observers (training instructors, teaching guides designers).
The construction of a map with the Work Skills AMOD method, involves implementing the following steps.
First stage: Brainstorming.
Once formed the expert panel, the first step is to promote discussion among participants about the identification of competencies and critical skills that should have examined the work profile.
As the facilitator is guiding the discussion of the panelists, the employee is recorded in card skills cited by the experts, which preferably should be translated into statements corresponding to the format: Word Object Condition.
A late to help view the output of the panel, the cards are being placed on a wall, no other criteria than their order of appearance.
According to the statements made, the facilitator will guide the discussion to topics that have not appeared or who have some degree of difficulty in its explicitness. The questions guide the discussion will be directed to inquire into the “problems” and “difficulties” considered as the most significant for the profile addressed.
In this sense, it is desirable that the other participants go out difficulties, which will serve as information for subsequent phases.
Once you finish all the particulars relating to the identification of critical competencies, we proceed to review what occurred in order to achieve consensus among the panelists.
Here, we present the results for this first stage, the panel produced by the method during exercise in the Seminar – Workshop. (3)
View Table No. 1: Identification of key competencies. Function: Training Manager
Second Stage: First grouping of statements.
After the whirlwind of ideas, conducting a first group of statements, eliminating those cards whose contents overlap or are not sufficiently distinctive.
Here are the results of this stage, produced by the panel during the exercise of the method in the Seminar – Workshop.
View Table No. 2: Identification of key competencies. Function: training manager. 1st Stage II Land
See Chart 3: Identification of key competencies. Function: training manager.
Stage II 1st order (continued)
View Table No. 4: Identification of key competencies. Function: training manager. 1st Stage II Land (continued)
Third stage: Identification of the main areas of competence.
This stage is the identification-by-panel areas of competence general enough to merge the skills or subcompetencies identified and ordered in the previous steps.
Once those areas agreed by the panel, will be placed under each heading, column-shaped cards with statements associated with the category, taking as a criterion an order from top to bottom. This directionality indicates a path from simpler skills to more complex. This process is repeated a
s often as general areas have been identified.
In turn, this process will make a second cleansing “of those cards, whose statements do not prove to be sufficiently distinctive.
The final product of this stage is a representation that allows to quickly view different levels of complexity, both within and between different areas area of expertise.
The following are the results produced by the panel during exercise method, for this third stage.
View Table No. 5: Identification of key competencies. Training Gestro. Stage III: Areas of Competence.
Fourth step: Construction of Training Curriculum
Once established the different columns or subcompetencies skills required to achieve general competencies (or areas of competence), we proceed to a final reorganization, comparing all sentences should be organized and training modules. For this, we shall consider the following criteria: how begins with what is, and how the training ends.
What is being sought at this stage is to build subcompetencies groups or families belonging to different general areas, so as to be able to establish a hierarchical order, which can range from the simple to the complex or practical to the theoretical, as deemed relevant by the panel of experts.
The slogan to carry out the clustering of the training modules subcompetencies operates with the following Restrictive: can only select one Subcompetencies, if you have previously selected in the preceding column.
The final product will be a series of modules grouped subcompetencies, belonging to different areas, similar levels of complexity, as represented in the display box that is presented below.
Also, we present the results produced by the panel during exercise method, for this fourth stage.
View Table 6: Curriculum Design. Training Gestro
View Table 7: Curriculum Design for Training
View Table 8: Designing Curriculum for training. Continuation
Fifth stage: self-evaluation process.
After building the map AMOD is the development of self-evaluation, using a scale ranging between 3 and 6 levels:
0: Unable to developing competition.
1: You can develop competition, but under constant supervision.
2: competition can develop, but any assistance.
3: competition can develop without supervision.
4: competition can develop without supervision, with a good level of quality.
5: competition can develop the quality and speed, showing initiative and adaptability to unforeseen situations.
6: competition can develop the quality and speed, showing initiative, adaptability and can lead others in developing the work
AMOD map is delivered to workers, who call themselves the scale above.
Each worker then checked against your score with the supervisor, and from there, start training activities.
Each time the operator feels it has improved or reached an achievement to be downgraded and confirm it with the supervisor.
Each time I have met a Subcompetencies learning, the expert committee, composed of employees, supervisors and representatives of the area of human resources, who, moreover, are the same people that made up the panel discussion, evaluated from the observation validates the performance and learning, giving a certificate of acquired competences.
1. Although the latter, according to Dr. Mertens remarks focusing the work in terms of outcomes rather than processes.
2. The exercise carried out during the seminar – workshop was aimed at the construction of a Training Curriculum for Training Manager. To accomplish this, we selected and formed, with some participants, a panel of five (5) experts. The rest participated as observers.
3.Cabe noted that in all stages of exercise-prioritized due to time-the end of it, rather than conducting a detailed analysis of critical competencies. Therefore, the results of this exercise should be considered as a first approximation in the construction of a curriculum for a Training Manager.